Content of Human Services Addressing Inequality in Australia

Question: Discuss about theContent of Human Servicesfor Addressing Inequality in Australia. Answer: Introduction Australia has been the home of refugees, and the UN Convention has a signatory with the country. Hundreds of thousands of refugees migrated to Australia over past two decades. The major forces that have driven this influx have as result of war from neighboring countries, civil unrest, and persecution. More than ten years the world countries adopted the Millennium Declaration, the countries agreed to create an equal and just world, embracing equality and solidarity as imperative in this 21st century. There emerged Millennium Development Goal which integrates all principles outlined in Millennium Declaration that describe the importance of balance. (Castles, 2009) Australia has tried to install policies to curb the increasing influx of refugees. One of the policies includes mandatory deportation (Brager, 2012) established in 1992 that any non-citizen in the country without a legal visa to deported. In 2012, the government of Australia transferred and detained all refugee without a visa to Nauru or Papua New Guinea. Refugees have sidelined in many organizations. Denied space to work and some have harassed. Discrimination against the refugees has also reported in many organization. Gender inequality among the refugees exists in many working places (Fincher R, 2011). The women in many cases have been affected. Neglecting women's rights, discrimination on job opportunities and low pay compared to their male counterpart. Inequality based on income, the refugees have received a small salary and to some extent accept nothing leading them to remain in abject poverty. (Robinson, 2011) Health Issues The most marginalized people with poor health services in Australia include the refugees. Refugees are prone to many increased health risks. The greatest health needs to force by individuals pre-migration factors and experiences, differences in selection procedure and the resettlement criteria. The crisis is even more striking for refugees held in detention, as mental health often attacks the long delay in the status determination due to anxiety, depression, and stress (Murr, 2010). Health issues of refugees in many organizations have not addressed with immediate effect. Health problems have ranged from an inadequate shelter, lack of proper sanitation, sterile water to sustain health and good hygiene, lack of adequate food which lead to poor nutrition conditions and increased transmission of diseases due to overcrowded. Discrimination Refugees in Australia face discrimination in both law and practice. They face discrimination on various grounds; most known include race and ethnic origin, religion and status. The source of discrimination experienced by asylum seekers in the Australia reflects many other who go through the same barrier of discrimination. Major areas that where discrimination one can witness include employment, access to other goods and services, and accommodation. For example, involve harassment and violence in public places. Women, especially from Afghanistan and Iraq, have forced to wear a veil. (Hugo, 2010) On the other hand, the take of government on refugees portrays in laws which are themselves discriminatory. Some may direct or indirect discriminatory on the ground of religion, ethnicity, and status. Refugees who entered the country with legal document were commissioned official programs for resettlement, by contrast, having been picked illegally selected by immigration officials. The selection has left many boat people to suffer discrimination on the fact of their social status contrary to international standards. (Fincher, 2011) The penalty that the refugees charged when entering the countrys jurisdiction Contrary to the agreement on the refugee convention. They are withheld access to many settlement services and social support and even disintegrated with their family members. (Miller, 2013) Disability The detention of refugees threatens the goal of integration of general community and the international conventions. The biggest challenge is to provide the disabled refugees appropriate services in the different organizations. The rights of physically disabled refugees challenged by the introduction of harsh policies in Australia hence denying them ability to present themselves in many organizations. In many international organizations elaborate very categorical on emphasizing refugee with disabilities have access to services to meet their basic needs (Anderson, 2009). However, the United Nations high Commissioner for Refugees detentions guidelines dictate that physical and mental disabled refugees detained on the direction from the qualified medical personnel that their health and welfare will not distract during their stay in the detention camps. They must also access to sanitary facilities. (Correspondence, 2009) Other international organizations that give the direction of refugees with disabilities include; the UN Standard Rules on Persons with Disabilities, which provides an upper hand on equality for refugees with a disability. Objectives of the Change Proposal Equality of the Opportunities To speed up the development agenda in Australia all discriminated persons among them refugees should integrate into community development by setting aside socio-economic and political positions (Carr, 2013). Focusing on the manifestation of exclusion such as health, education and different level of income instead of focusing on structural factors like inadequate access to resources and discrimination has narrowed extraordinary measures aimed at addressing the inequality (Council, 2013). More attention should place on matter underlying economic, social, and cultural which lead to inequality. Migration Policies The government should revoke them and establish other swift and acceptable policies, friendly policies that will leave every refugee in the land comfortable. Creating well-managed migration policies which will accommodate sustainable immigration regulations into national development plans. With no doubt, the system will reduce inequality, provide jobs even to the refugees and the entire economic growth. (Brager, 2012) Improving Governance and Access Justice Strengthening governance at the organizational level where governance is weakest. The governance system in Australian refugees camps is complexly calling for changes. For an instant, the department of human service should create several groups working to ensure security is guaranteed the groups may in two categories: one made up of refugees and the other by agencies such as NGOs and UNHCR mandated to oversee all activities of refugees camps. (Carrington, 2011) Many of the refugees live far away from justice and legal aid providers. Lack of legal knowledge and financial power make them lack support to air their grievances. Therefore, the Australian government should bring legal services very closer to the refugees and give them machinery to advocate for their rights, capacity building for policy making, and creating awareness on human rights. (Correspondence, 2009) Enhancement on Transformational Change Addressing on the reduction of inequality with an insight of transformational change will follow the suit of Millennium Declaration and will check on government and organizations accountability and transparency to improve agenda that is inclusive and non-discriminatory. However meeting inequality targets will require synergy with other factors such addressing discrimination and structural cause together with causes of conflicts. Therefore, the government should mandate and put mechanism tools to assess, and monitor the broad perspective of policies on socio-political as well as economic rights. (Australia, 2010) Benefits of Addressing Inequality in Australia Refugees crisis in the country has challenged. Not even the local administration but also the international governments and this require great approach and mechanisms that will lead every party satisfied: both the refugees and the organizations. The following benefits accrue from the change proposal; (Carrington, 2011) It will enhance the highest possible niche of support and aid in the restrictive ways. The policies should emulate and designed to make sure all refugees including the disabled, have got the opportunity to contribute and participate in many arenas maximally in all aspect of organizations. Reduce mortality and morbidity rates among the refugees through implementing several mechanisms: involvement of refugees in planning and effecting the policies concerning their matter, meet the specific basic needs of refugees, the introduction of good health and nutrition facilities system, and we a duo-sectorial and preventative health strategy in all organization. The change proposal will bring about accountability and transparency. The above objectives will hold the organization accountable for progress towards development goals. Accountability and transparency will promote and enhance the service delivery and meet the refugees need by getting those jobs hence reducing unemployment among the refugees. (Carrington, 2012) The proposal will lead to easy access to information to reduce barriers to socio-political contribution. The organization will emulate appropriate services and lay down proactive policies and social connection that influence social context and lead to inequality and discrimination. The proposal is addressing the need for legislative reforms and immediate implementation, which elaborate the issues of discrimination and refugees exclusion and respond to their rights accordingly. Strength and Weaknesses Although the proposal will impact on service delivery system, it fruits will barely take long. The issue of legislative changes, for example, will need deep insight and extensive looking on both sides of positive and adverse. The increase of advocacy effort will provide the representative with education on the values of refugees programs and also improve the social cohesiveness between the refugees and communities in the Australia. Active efforts of the proposal will enhance the security check process for resettlement of refugees and impeach the current procedural step. It will also lead to adjustment of security monitoring process to allow dynamism in evaluating inadmissibility victual. Weaknesses Include The proposal will require the huge budget to implement it. The proposal may have inconsistencies because it does not have a sharing approach. The change proposal does not outline the migration channel in case of pressure. Works Cited Anderson, R., 2009. Settlement Dispersal of immigarnts and Refugees in Europe. Working Paper Series, 4(2), pp. 3-8. Australia, A. C. O., 2010. Economic,civil, and Social Contribution of Refugees and Humanitarian Entraint, Sydney: Refugees Council of Australia. Carr, J., 2013. Creating Employment and Education for Refugees. Given a Chance, 26(12), pp. 33-42. Correspondence, U., 2009. Operation Protection ijn Camps and Settlement, Sydney: UNHCR. Council, B. L., 2013. Analysis on the Situation of the REfugee Camps from the rule of law aspect. The iland Journal, 11(1), pp. 32-37. Fincher R, S. P., 2011. The Complex contentsof Inequality in creating Unequal futures. Sydney, allen and Unwin. George Brager, S. H., 2012. Changing Human Services. 2nd ed. new York: Free Press. Hugo, G., 2010. Immigrant Settlement outside of Australia capital city. Popul. Space Place, 14(43), pp. 553-571. K Carrington, R. H., 2011. Benefit and Burden of the Migration. 2 ed. London: Oxford. K Carrngton, A. M., 2012. The Social Costs and Benefits of Migration to Australia. 5 ed. Armidde: University of New England. Miller, L. E., 2013. Manging Human service. 4th ed. New York: Quorum Books. S Castles, M. M., 2009. The Age Of Migration. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. S Murr, S. S., 2010. immigration and refugees health care in Australia. Australia Health Review, 4(1), pp. 2-5. V robinson, R. A., 2011. Spreading the Burden. Policy Press, 5(3), pp. 23-25.